Adelphi Student Sues, Claims False AI Essay Accusation Ruined Record

Adelphi Student Files Lawsuit Over AI Essay Accusation

A Long Island college student has filed a lawsuit against Adelphi University, alleging that the institution's AI detection software falsely accused him of using artificial intelligence to write an essay, significantly impacting his academic standing. The case highlights growing concerns about the reliability of AI detection tools in educational settings and their potential to affect students' futures.

Orion Newby, a 19-year-old first-year student at Adelphi, claims the university's AI software incorrectly flagged his history paper on Christianity. The accusation resulted in a zero grade for the assignment, despite Newby's insistence that he wrote the essay himself with the help of tutors. The incident has raised questions about how AI detection systems evaluate student work and the consequences of false positives.

Professor Questions Essay Authenticity

According to Newby, his professor expressed doubt about the essay's authenticity, stating that the writing style did not match Newby's previous work. The professor suggested that AI may have been used to enhance the essay, leading to the zero grade. Newby, however, maintains that he spent 15 to 20 hours working on the paper with tutors, emphasizing his dedication to the assignment.

"I put a lot of effort into this paper," Newby said in an interview. "The idea that AI could have written it is not only insulting but also inaccurate. I worked hard with my tutors to make sure it was up to standard."

Learning Differences and Academic Support

Newby has learning differences related to language processing and is enrolled in a program at Adelphi that provides additional support. His mother, Candy Newby, confirmed that he regularly uses tutors for grammatical assistance, a practice she says is essential for his academic success.

"Orion has always worked hard to overcome his learning challenges," she said. "The accusation that he cheated is not only unfair but also ignores the progress he has made with the help of his tutors."

Family Challenges Plagiarism Claim

The Newby family's lawsuit alleges that Adelphi's AI detection software flagged similarities between Orion's paper and online material due to his proper citations, rather than actual plagiarism. Hunter Newby, Orion's father, expressed frustration that his son was not given an opportunity to appeal the decision.

"He was branded a plagiarist without a fair hearing," Hunter Newby said. "This has caused him immense stress and could have long-term effects on his academic career."

University Mandates Anti-Plagiarism Course

As a result of the accusation, Adelphi required Newby to complete an anti-plagiarism course before enrolling in other classes. This requirement, according to the lawsuit, was unjustified and further damaged Newby's academic reputation. The family is seeking to dismiss the adjudication and receive compensation for the ordeal.

"We want Orion's record cleared," Candy Newby said. "He deserves a fair chance to continue his education without this stain on his record."

Legal Battle and Future Implications

The lawsuit is scheduled for a hearing in early November, where the court will review the case. Adelphi University has declined to comment on the ongoing litigation, citing its policy not to discuss such matters publicly. The outcome of the case could set a precedent for how universities handle AI detection software and accusations of academic misconduct.

Experts have noted that this case underscores the need for transparency and accountability in the use of AI tools in education. "Universities must ensure that their AI detection systems are accurate and fair," said Dr. Emily Thompson, an education technology specialist. "False accusations can have serious consequences for students, and institutions need to be more cautious in their approach."

As the legal battle unfolds, the case serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding AI in education and the importance of protecting students' rights.