News
Inquirer's AI Content Snafu
Source: crossingbroad.com
Published on May 22, 2025
Updated on May 22, 2025

Inquirer Faces AI-Generated Content Controversy
The Inquirer recently published an article detailing the appearance of AI-generated content in a newspaper supplement, sparking discussions about editorial integrity and content vetting processes. The incident involved a 56-page feature supplement produced by a syndication company, which included fictional book recommendations created by artificial intelligence.
Gabriel Escobar, The Inquirer’s editor and senior vice president, confirmed that the use of AI-generated content violates the publication’s internal policies. He emphasized that the newsroom staff was not involved in the production or editing of the supplement, known as "Heat Index," which was distributed by King Features. The incident has prompted The Inquirer to explore ways to improve content vetting to prevent similar issues in the future.
King Features, the company responsible for distributing the supplement, acknowledged that the content was created by a freelance content creator who failed to disclose the use of AI. As a result, King Features has severed ties with the creator. The incident highlights the growing challenges of ensuring authenticity in content production, especially when relying on external contributors.
Fake Book Recommendations
Among the AI-generated content were two fictional books titled "Schuylkill Expressway: A Scenic and Enjoyable Driving Experience" and "Joel Embiid’s 82-Game Season." Another story, "Harry Potter and the Flyers’ Recent Title," was not published. The inclusion of these fake recommendations underscores the risks associated with AI-generated content, particularly when it comes to maintaining credibility and accuracy in journalism.
Implications for Content Vetting
The incident raises broader questions about the role of AI in content creation and the need for robust vetting processes. As AI technologies become more prevalent, publications must adapt their policies to ensure that content meets editorial standards. The Inquirer’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for other media outlets, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability in content production.
Future Steps
Moving forward, The Inquirer is committed to strengthening its content vetting processes to prevent the inclusion of AI-generated content that violates its policies. Gabriel Escobar noted that the publication is exploring new measures to ensure that all content, regardless of its source, aligns with The Inquirer’s commitment to accuracy and integrity. This incident underscores the need for ongoing vigilance in the face of evolving technologies.